|   
 
 | 
   | 
   | Talk must become action if Drydocks 
          is to be saved
 By Miriam 
          Dunn
 The best way to save Malta Drydocks from a bleak future is to stop postponing 
          difficult decisions, face reality and act promptly.
 These were the no-nonsense words of the yards chairman, 
          John Cassar White, when speaking yesterday to The Malta Financial and 
          Business Times.
 Much has been made of the fact that there is not full agreement on various 
          aspects of the restructuring plan for Malta Drydocks, which was handed 
          in to Cabinet last week. There has also been scepticism as to whether 
          targets laid out in the plan, drawn up by a task force specifically 
          set up to deal with this sensitive sector, can be reached.
 Mr Cassar White admitted there are "no guarantees" in what 
          he described as "this risky business", but implied that it 
          was a change in mentality that could make or break the yards 
          future.
 "Our targets are not unrealistic unless we assume that the best 
          we can achieve is mediocrity," he said.
 In the plan, there were projections that the workforce would be cut 
          by 50% within seven years, alongside the removal of almost all government 
          subsidies. The task force also worked on the lines that turnover would 
          rise to almost double.
 Mr Cassar White yesterday dismissed the idea that the problems at the 
          Drydocks could be solved with better marketing or investing in new activities 
          in which the yard could never be competitive, describing these 
          as "just red herrings that distract us from the real issues".
 One such problem is the fact that the ship repair industry has significant 
          overcapacity worldwide.
 "Even if we do everything right there is always a risk that we 
          will not achieve our targets fully," he said. "But we will 
          surely fail miserably if we continue to postpone difficult but important 
          decisions.
 "We owe to ourselves and to our workers to face reality, talk less 
          and act more promptly to save our shipyards from a bleak future."
 Mr Cassar White warned against the idea of relying on government help 
          right from the beginning and also highlighted the need to think in competitive 
          terms.
 "If the way we manage our business is fundamentally sound, we can 
          redefine our targets, take corrective measures and, if need be, ask 
          for assistance," he said. "This does not mean that right from 
          the very beginning of our planning process we rely on what the Italians 
          call assistenzialismo, i.e. a mentality that in case of 
          need we can rely on government bailing us out of our difficulties.
 "This mentality which unfortunately is so prevalent among public 
          sector companies in Malta deprives us of our hunger to succeed, to rely 
          on our resources, to prove to ourselves and to everyone else that we 
          can win this difficult challenge."
 When asked how the Drydocks management would deal with any protests 
          the unions might make over job shedding, Mr Cassar White admitted that 
          the unions have a "very difficult task ahead of them".
 "They are the ones who have to face their members who naturally 
          fear over the uncertainty that this restructuring will bring to their 
          lives," he said.
 The Drydocks chairman said that the Council of the Malta Drydocks would 
          continue to lead in the reform programme if all the parties agree on 
          reforms.
 Turning to the thorny issue of lack of agreement over the best way forward 
          for the yard, Mr Cassar White stressed that the shipyards would 
          have far better prospects if there was consensus to change the factors 
          which were affecting performance there.
 He admitted that the management is proposing a "radical change", 
          but stressed this was a bid to guarantee a better future for the shipyards.
 "The other two options to agreement to change are maintaining the 
          status quo or a programme of forced change.
 "A very different style of management will be needed if either 
          of these latter options are adopted for our shipyards," was his 
          final, thought-provoking comment.
    |